This Airport Will Likely Be Renamed After Dolly Parton

The Nashville International Airport will likely soon be named after Dolly Parton.

The move comes after there were over 154 thousand signatures on a Change.org petition asking for the name change before Parton’s death on Tuesday.

Dolly Parton’s extraordinary life is forever woven into the fabric of our state,” Gov. Bill Lee (R-TN) said in a statement on Friday.

“From her rural mountain home in East Tennessee to global stages, Dolly carried the Volunteer Spirit with her. At a place where Tennessee welcomes the world, it is fitting that Nashville International Airport would bear the name of our state’s favorite daughter and greet travelers with the enduring legacy of Dolly’s music, generosity, faith, and kindness,” he continued.

The renaming discussion will be brought up at the Metro Nashville Airport Authority’s September 17 meeting.

BLUF
There are far too many conservative politicians and commentators who lack spines. They are afraid to stand tall, and they will retreat even before being criticized.

Why Conservatives on this Side of the Atlantic Lose.

I am an expat U.S. citizen writing to you from Ireland. I doubt it will surprise you that here, in Ireland, and across the nearby islands of the East Atlantic archipelago (a/k/a the British Isles), there are few conservative newspapers, podcasters, and other pundits. Amongst the handful of conservative commentators is nothing like a spirit of cooperation. The larger number of them are prima donnas who will bad mouth other conservatives for no apparent reason at all. And for the crumbs of popularity and social media engagement, they are all too willing to engage in random anti-Americanism and TDS-driven commentary.

Continue reading “”

Cuccinelli to Argue Militia Clause Protects AR-15s in Supreme Court Brief

“Former Virginia AG [and former Acting Deputy Secretary at the Department of Homeland Security] Ken Cuccinelli is drafting an amicus brief for a coalition of groups and key individuals in the Viramontes semi-automatic gun ban case that is coming in front of the United States Supreme Court,” Second Amendment advocate and NRA “reform director” Dennis Fusaro informed a close circle of fellow activists by email Saturday.

Fusaro, probably most known to AmmoLand readers through his involvement in attempting to persuade an unheeding Association to commit needed resources to a “get out the vote” effort in Virginia’s 2025 election, is soliciting funds to finance the legal work.

Cuccinelli’s novel approach was documented in his challenge to Virginia’s semi-auto/magazine ban  asking for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief because  the “ban provisions of the Act  violate the militia clause of Article I, Section 13 of the Constitution of Virginia.” (While acknowledging that Plaintiffs will suffer “irreparable harm if the Ban becomes effective and is later determined to be unconstitutional,” Spotsylvania Circuit Court Judge William E. Glover subsequently allowed the ban to stand, citing “the potential of harm to the Commonwealth.”

“The Supreme Court’s decision to hear Viramontes v. Cook County, No. 25-238 (7th Circuit), consolidated with Grant v. Higgins (2nd Circuit), presents an opportunity to do more than win the immediate fight over AR-15-platform rifles,” Cuccinelli argues, recapping proposed language discussed in an Aug. 9 Zoom meeting.

“The Court has never squarely explained how the Second Amendment’s Militia Clause informs the meaning of the operative right ‘to keep and bear Arms.’ United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), plainly connected the Amendment to the militia and to the constitutional importance of arms having a relationship to militia purposes.”

That’s a point some of us have been trying to urge the gun groups filing 2A cases to include.

“Ignoring Core Purpose Makes 2nd Amendment More Vulnerable to Infringements: The Militia Aspect,” Part 1 and Part 2, I wrote for Firearms News in 2020. Forgetting the fighting tyranny part serves no one’s interests but would-be tyrants.

“That is the focus I would bring to an amicus brief: establishing a constitutional principle that not only prevents ‘military’ characteristics from becoming a constitutional liability, but makes them an affirmative basis for protection,” Cuccinelli asserts. “The more effective an arm is for the purposes for which a militia would require arms, the harder it should be to argue that its effectiveness somehow removes it from constitutional protection.”

Establishing this with SCOTUS “could therefore reach substantially further than the particular rifles before the Court,” he adds.

Fusaro is urging gun owners who realize the value of what this means to join and support this effort with contributions sent to RightsWatch.org.

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual State.
–Alexander Hamilton

From different sources, this didn’t affect the E-File system.


ATF Confirms ‘Major’ Cyberattack Without Offering Details of What Was Targeted

While the ATF has confirmed that it was the target of a “major” cyberattack by the ransomware group known as Qilin, details of the data breach are still under wraps, and it’s unclear what information may have been stolen or compromised.

One of the concerns is that the details of potentially tens of millions of gun owners might have been accessed. The ATF has digital files of billions of documents from FFLs who have gone out of business, including the Form 4473s that were filled out by customers. If the hackers accessed that material, it could be used for a variety of nefarious purposes, from identity theft to providing criminals with a handy list of gun owners in their area. (though that would take a little bit of work on the part of the ransomware group).

“The NRA is deeply concerned about how data leaks can expose the privacy of gun owners,” a spokesperson for the National Rifle Association told the DCNF. “We are working with the administration to understand the scope and severity of the situation, and will keep our members updated as facts are confirmed.”

“If anything this reinforces why we feel it’s critical that the ATF compile as little information about gun owning Americans as possible,” Second Amendment Foundation Senior Director of Litigation William Sack said. “Not only should our government not have that information, but they’ve shown over and over again that it’s not even secure in their possession.”

At the moment, very little data is secure, whether it belongs to a government agency or a private company. Ransomware attacks have become increasingly common, with the Department of Justice announcing on Wednesday that it had taken control of the platforms QScan and QTRouter, which are connected to the Chinese government.

In a court filing, the DOJ revealed that it had been the target of attacks using the platforms, along with other government entities like NASA, the Federal Reserve, Department of Energy, U.S. Senate, Department of Health and Human Services and National Institutes of Health.

The website Cyber News reports that the Russia-linked hackers targeted a system that contains information “tied to ATF investigations,” though the agency has not officially confirmed that detail.

The Bureau stressed that the impacted system operates separately from the ATF enterprise network, but that doesn’t change the fact that leaked information about ATF investigations could pose a serious national security risk.

ATF investigations can target a wide range of serious criminal activity – from illegal firearms trafficking and violent gangs to bomb makers, terror suspects, and even domestic violence offenders.

Ongoing ATF investigations could be compromised, potentially undermining prosecutions and exposing hundreds, if not thousands, of informants, witnesses, and other law enforcement activities across the country.

There’s no shortage of bad actors who would love to get their hands on that kind of information, including Mexican-based drug cartels and foreign governments hostile to U.S. interests.

Again, as of right now we don’t know what information was accessed because the ATF is keeping those details to itself and the agencies investigating the cyberattack. Given the implications for gun owners, gun sellers, and firearm industry members, as well as ongoing ATF investigations, this “major” breach should be of major concern and spark major discussions on Capitol Hill about the amount of data that the ATF has compiled on those involved in lawful firearm transactions.

Exposing the Gun Control Industry’s Financiers: The Joyce Foundation.

NSSF launched a new campaign this year called Gun Rights Insights. The goal is to drag the big money donors that fuel the gun control campaign into the sunlight. No more hiding behind veils and in corporate boardroom ivory towers.

Gun Rights Insights pulls back the curtain to show that the gun control agenda is nothing more than an astroturf agenda living off the funding and the backing of a few billionaires and progressive activist foundations flooding the field with waves of cash, up to $400 million annually.

With this money, they buy influence, media airtime and followers who buy into the false narrative that surrendering God-given rights will make America safer while they surround themselves with armed security in gated compounds.

Gun Rights Insights previously exposed antigun billionaire Michael Bloomberg, George Soros and Hollywood A-list celebrities.

Allow Gun Rights Insights to introduce…The Joyce Foundation.

Who They Are

The Joyce Foundation, based in Chicago, was founded by Beatrice Joyce Kean in 1948, the heiress of an Iowa lumber executive. They now pitch the foundation as a “private, nonpartisan philanthropy that invests in public policies and strategies to advance racial equity and economic mobility for the next generation in the Great Lakes region.”

Founder Kean passed away in 1972, leaving 90 percent of her estate — or $120 million — to the foundation, according to InfluenceWatch, a watchdog group run by the Capital Research Center. Soon after, The Joyce Foundation shifted focus to include government policies. Notably, they target gun control with a board comprised of anti-gun activists.

Chief of among those steering The Joyce Foundation’s work was President Barack Obama, who was on the foundation’s board of directors from 1994–2002, before he entered public life. President Obama espoused strict gun control, calling for a ban on modern sporting rifles, America’s most-popular selling centerfire rifle. He also demanded a national firearm registry through a universal background check scheme.

Valerie Jarrett was a former senior advisor to President Obama and is currently the CEO of the Obama Foundation. She’s a former board member of The Joyce Foundation.

Today, other members of his White House still serve on The Joyce Foundation’s board. Margot Rogers, was the Chief of Staff to the Obama administration’s U.S. Department of Education Secretary Arne Duncan. Today, Rogers is The Joyce Foundation’s Chair of the Board. The Vice Chair of the Board is filled by Tracey Maeres, who was on President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Cecilia Munoz served eight years in the Obama administration, including five years leading the White House Domestic Policy Council. Today, Munoz is a board member for the Joyce Foundation.

Continue reading “”